Â鶹ÊÓƵ

The Tik Tok Challenge Belongs To Us All…

Jun 11, 2021

I am more than old enough to remember Princess Diana’s death with absolute clarity.

I know that I was sitting in my study, working on an assignment at our home in Buderim, when the now-famous car crash in a Parisian tunnel occurred. The paparazzi chase and their invasion into privacy was legendary. Whichever side of the Royal fence you find yourself perched upon, there is no doubt that the nature of her death and the publicity that surrounded it has had a profound effect upon many, including her younger son, Harry. No doubt. I remember the anger associated with the media who hounded her relentlessly. I also remember an article at that time that proposed to me and all other readers that we, too, were responsible, in some way, for her death. Offended, I read on – the journalist – a name long gone from memory proposed that the millions who bought newspapers, magazines, and other publications about the princess had fuelled the paparazzi fire. They had legitimised the invasion of privacy, they had urged media to transgress previously unexplored boundaries in the quest to tell more, show more, and offer unique insights into a life that was intriguing.


At her funeral, her brother, Charles Spencer, described his sister as the most hunted person of the modern age. Ian Down, managing editor at the photo agency SilverHub, told TIME that ‘Editors couldn’t get enough of her.’ She lived almost exclusively in the public domain, in a love/hate relationship with the media. Twenty-four years on, it is not newspapers or magazines that define notions of privacy but social media. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok have redefined what’s share-worthy and what’s not. When illicit and confronting content wends its way into these platforms, we rale against their existence, in the same way we called for paparazzi accountability in Paris, 1997. Yet, as people choose to broadcast their most personal moments without filter, the parameters between what is and what is not acceptable to share, becomes increasingly blurred. When news erupts of another dangerous TikTok challenge we call out for greater control, school action, more sanctions, tighter legislation – all this, as we simultaneously send messages to family and friends via our favourite social media platform.


We know that the content that filters through TikTok and Instagram, as well as via other social media platforms, varies significantly – from that which is innocuous through to that which is deeply dangerous and disturbing. We know that cute images of kittens and puppies are used to lure social media users into watching content we would never permit on our family television screens: don’t we? This is a social media site that last year had more than 500 million active monthly users, 66% of whom were under the age of 30. Roy Morgan data shows more than 1.6 million Australians visit the TikTok website or use its app in an average week, and more than a fifth of those are Generation Alpha, those born between 2010 to now (Squires, 2020). It is reported that TikTok users spend an average of 52 minutes per day on the platform, on the smart phones (aka computers) that we have purchased to keep our children safe, the phones we have bought and continue to pay for, so that they can call us with when they need help, or need to make contact – yes, it’s the same smart phone.


Of course, filtering platforms allow parameters to be put in place (e.g. FamilyZone) for greater safety – you can turn features on and off remotely, you can monitor the sites your daughter accesses, you can filter out spam, offensive comments, specific keywords, and block accounts. But we also know that filters cannot catch everything. Hashtags change frequently, and creative spelling helps in the bypassing of filters. We are talking about controlling adolescent behaviour that is being courted, groomed and sought out by mega technology companies whose first motivation is a profit margin. It’s a powerful juggernaut. So, what do we do? Bury our heads in the hundred other worries that deserve attention. What we do, is to continue to place weighty value of ongoing conversations with our children around safe use of technology. We continue to work hard to ensure that our children know that they can confidently discuss any distressing content with us, because when we do so, then their safety is protected far more than any app or filtering system can provide. We also take up our own responsibility as members of the wider community, and, at any time we see inappropriate or concerning material – then we alert the safety commission via their website: We also work to empower our children to keep their friends safe, those that are perhaps more vulnerable and more easily swayed – we keep in conversation with them. And, be brave – when it’s time, turn their phone off – in person, or remotely. Platforms alone are not dangerous but the way in which they are used, can be.



As the journalist alluded to in 1997 when writing of Princess Diana’s tragic death, it was all too easy to point the finger of blame at the paparazzi or the driver or the media, generally. It was so much harder to look within to our own individual responsibilities. I think social media demands us to do so – to look within, and to exercise agency in supporting our children’s safe practices online. The TikTok challenge is one for us all.



Dr Linda Evans | Principal


References

Roberts, R. (2017). The Washington Post. 27 August 2017.


Rolfe, B. (2020). . Yahoo News. September 8. 2020.


Samuelson, K. (2017). . Time. 27 August 2017.


Sanger, D. and Barnes, J. (2020). The New York Times. 7 August 2020.


Squires, W. (2020). . The Sydney Morning Herald. September 13, 2020.








More News…

By Graeme Morris 10 Sep, 2024
Storytelling, building connections, and engaging our community is irreplaceable in the marketing strategy of a school. Â鶹ÊÓƵMarketing Manager, Kathryn Doyle, talks about what resonates in modern-day school communication.
By Graeme Morris 10 Sep, 2024
For Year 7 Boarder, Audrey Colville, just getting from her home on Groote Eylandt to Â鶹ÊÓƵis an adventure in itself.
By Graeme Morris 10 Sep, 2024
I enjoy watching Â鶹ÊÓƵsport, debating, dance, choir … (and the list meanders on) – from the sideline. There is joy in watching without responsibility. It does not, as Mr Tregaskis would attest, mean that I do not wince when I see what I believe to be, an incorrect umpire’s decision. You have no idea how much I will miss standing on the sideline observing young people learning to be. After all, these performance arenas are just that – places of becoming. That is, when we, as adults don’t mess with ‘the becoming.’ In anticipation of losing my legitimate reason to watch Â鶹ÊÓƵplay anything, perform anything … I am concentrating on the privilege of the moment. I am soaking in the delights of fiercely contested debating finals, narrow wins and losses on the courts and fields of Toowoomba where the temperature is always colder or hotter than forecast and, the unparalleled joy of Junior School girls dancing on stage without inhibition, some perfectly attuned with the music’s beat and other’s not. I am absorbing the opportunity to witness learning at its essence. Performance in sport or The Arts is a public event. If your artwork is hung in a gallery space it is ‘public’ – open to be appreciated or criticised. If one is singing, dancing, debating or playing an instrument on stage with an audience there is nowhere to hide if an error is made. And, on a court or field – one’s performance is open to scrutiny or praise – or everything in between. Becoming is core business at these times. Anthony Simcoe, perhaps best known for his role as Steve in the epic Australian film, ‘The Castle’ with lines like, “Dale dug a hole, Dad,” or “How much for jousting sticks?” was a gangly fifteen-year-old boy when I first met him at Burnside State High School in Nambour, where he was seeking to master the volleyball dig, serve and set. Who would have imagined his becoming? Even years on, Anthony would say that he learned to become an actor through washing dishes at cafes – earning money between acting jobs – learning to observe the humanness in his customers. He washed a lot of dishes and served a lot of tables in order to become a credible member of ‘The Castle’s’ Kerrigan family. In tedious hours he learned about people and about hard, repetitive work. Repetition is the underpinning pattern of rehearsal and practice. Some of us do it well, others not so. I hear it in action many mornings as I pass the Performing Arts building, I see it on mornings and afternoons in our gym and on our oval. Rehearsal. Practice. Becoming. It is far more palpable; it would seem, than our classroom learning which inhabits a far more private space: often behind a closed door. How special it was, a few weeks ago, to invite the parents of Year 12.1 English to join their daughter, Mrs Anderson and I for a Period Five Friday afternoon lesson of ‘Macbeth.’ Seated in a huge circle in the confines of G24, students directed the lesson: spelling, quotations, thematic discussions and questions, for their parent and the other class members. It was an impressive moment (from a teacher’s perspective anyway) – to see students demonstrate their knowledge in a semi-public forum. It was timely for parents, no doubt, to remember the awkwardness of not knowing an answer, the joy of accuracy as well as the discomfort of feedback about an incorrect assumption – these are aspects of learning with which our students grapple, daily … as they become. There was delight in sharing the messiness of learning, the non-linear path of knowledge and how these segue to ‘becoming.’ Although, that moment of self-actualisation we seek or reaching the mountain top does not come at the same time or in the same way for any of us. And we have to be patient from our sideline position. We have to trust the process. We have to remember also, that losing and missing out are important components of future winning. We have to remember in the words of Saint Ignatius Loyola, Spanish Priest, theologian and thinker, “we learn only when we are ready to learn.” St. Ignatius reminds us that education is not confined to classrooms; it can happen anywhere and at any time: if we allow it. And thus, as adults, as we inhabit more than our fair share of sidelines real and metaphoric, during the rundown to the finish line, let us all be gracious in allowing our young people ‘to become’ … a process that is uneven, at times uncomfortable, messy, deeply disappointing and … often wildly exhilarating. Let us enjoy each and every facet and be gracious in the spaces where alignment with expectation is not met in performance or outcome. It is here, in this place, which can feel unpleasant, unsatisfactory and uninvited that the greatest learning and hence the greatest opportunity to become, can occur. If we, as adults who should know better, don’t mess with ‘the becoming.’ “Another ball game lost! Good grief!” Charlie moans. “I get tired of losing. Everything I do, I lose!” “Look at it this way, Charlie Brown,” Lucy replies. “We learn more from losing than we do from winning.” “That makes me the smartest person in the world!” replies Charlie. Win some. Learn some. Become. Dr Linda Evans │Principal  REFERENCE Maxwell, J. (2013) On Turning a Loss into a Gain | Adapted from Sometimes You Win, Sometimes You Learn (October 2013)
All News
Share by: